All couples argue from time to time, and Ed and I are no exception. Earlier this evening, we got into a fight about porn star Mark Davis: is he cut or not? Based on the magazine I was chopping up for Smuttons, he looked cut to me – but Ed pointed out the wrinkly skin in the picture, saying “that’s a foreskin. trust me, I know dick.” I argued – it looked cut to me, and I too know dick. We could not come to an agreement on the foreskin issue, so I did the only logical thing: I went online to check.
First stop: Wikipedia. It’s where I usually start, because it has a lot of good information about the things I am interested in – ie: things that have no bearing on real life whatsoever, and it’s always the non-important issues that have the most accurate information. It made perfect sense to me, but Ed thought this was absolutely hysterical. He laughed at me, a lot – “you went to Wikipedia to see if a porn star has a foreskin or not? What kind of internet do you USE where information like that is readily available, especially on Wikipedia?!” – and just about peed himself with the hilarity of my ridiculousness and all. Silly Kimli!
…
I WIN.
I mean, I was wrong – yep, that was a foreskin – but the information WAS on Wikipedia, and that is worth all the foreskins in the world.
HAH!
oh my good god. that is hilarious. only you, my dear…
What CAN’T the Internet do?
mr davis and i share a birthday. cept im taller. ahem.
Too funny! I would imagine porn producers would want to know that kind of detail about Mark Davis. It is probably standard information on his resume, and could make a difference between him getting a gig or not. Kinda like breeding bulls. I used to typeset Cow/Bull Sale catalogues back in the 1980’s, and “size” was always recorded in the Bull specs.
It sounds a lot bigger when you measure in centimeters. Go metric system!
Another reason to donate to Wikipedia!
Pingback: mmx in review « delicious juice dot com: unapologetically inappropriate